In Slap At Microsoft, Google Has 'No Plan To Pay Our Users' - InformationWeek

At the in Las Vegas on Thursday, Saint Nicholas Fox, manager of concern merchandise direction at , dismissed concerns about the competitory impact of program, which honors Live Search users with discounts on selected purchases.

"We have got no program to pay our users to utilize our product," Fox stated. Google, he said, will vie through user experience and quality, rather than "paying users Nis and dimes."

More Internet Insights
White Papers

Intriguingly, Fox said that Google believes strongly in cost-per-action advertising, which Google have been testing among a limited grouping of advertizers for more than than a year. Cost-per-action advertising -- Live Search cash-back is a discrepancy of this theoretical account -- affects a fee for a specific online action, like purchasing a product, rather than a fee for a chink on an ad. "The consequences have got been extremely encouraging," he said. "It's been portion of our vision for a piece and we're actually starting to see some really strong results."

Fox brushed aside worries about the impact of departing endowment on Google. "The degree of churn is actually very, very, very low and easily outweighed by the high-profile additions we convey on board," he said. "It's not something we're particularly concerned about internally. Honestly, I believe it acquires grandiloquent in the press."

Fox's message to investors was that gross chances for Google abound, particularly through polishes in hunt relevance, user experience, and advertisement quality.

The per centum of questions for which Google actually functions advertisements stays fairly small, said Fox. "A big part of those questions really should have got ads," he said.

The challenge for Google is developing systems to assist advertizers topographic point advertisements automatically for relevant questions that they haven't planned to offer on. "We necessitate to come up these chances to advertizers so they cognize what they should be targeting," he said.

Fox explained that Google goes on to better advertisement quality, which intends serving advertisements to those most likely to react to them. He offered the illustration of command on the hunt keywords "Harry Potter," which would ensue in a low click-through charge per unit because so many people with different ends hunt using those words. What Google trusts to make is give advertizers more insight into the purposes and desires of its users. Thus, those seeking to purchase a Harry Potter book, as opposing to, say, those seeking information about Harry Potter films, could be presented with the chance to purchase the relevant book via an ad.

That kind of targeting remains Google's end in the linguistic context of societal networks, which haven't proven to be very effectual topographic points to advertise. "The whole industry have probably been surprised in the trouble in monetizing societal networks," said Fox.